03/17/2022 / By Ethan Huff
The New York City Department of Education (NYC DOE) is defending the use of a pornographic homosexual book being taught to children as part of their public school curriculum, arguing that it “is well written.”
NYC DOE Schools Chancellor David Brooks said that Maia Kobabe’s “Gender Queer: A Memoir” publication is necessary in the classroom because “students with a similar experience will feel affirmed.”
The book is a coming of age story about a girl who grows up with hippie parents, finds herself at odds with public school culture, has trouble with puberty and fantasizes about having a penis.
“Gender Queer” also contains suggestions for students about how they should seek out books in their school library about how to pursue “gender identity” exploration, meaning transgenderism.
Beyond that, the book also contains graphic images of LGBTQ sexual behavior for which at least one mother petitioned the Department for answers.
“Why is there child pornography in NY School Libraries?” she asked, only to be gaslighted about how such material is necessary so that children can explore deviant sexual lifestyles with which they might identify.
“Why is there graphic pornographic and grooming text in the NY school libraries?” she further asked.
“Our family has been harmed by gender ideology and pornography in schools, leading to three hospitalizations and a suicide attempt. Transition was not therapeutic and yet everywhere we turn, there is more propaganda pushing our children towards transition. There are no resources on detransition. Why is this?”
This distraught mother went on to lament the lack of proper education at local public schools, where teachers are failing students educationally while indoctrinating them into wild perversions.
“Who is looking out for the mental, physical and sexual health of our adolescents?” this mother further asked. “Why are you grooming them into a status as a lifelong patient and surgical proving ground?”
The mother concluded her letter by asking to speaking with someone about ways to better help adolescents deal with “very typical experiences of dysphoria,” though she did not receive the response she should have from the resistant Department.
“There is nothing more transphobic than failing to help dysphoric kids like mine. I’m terrified of what is happening.”
Had this mother never sent her children to public school in the first place, they more than likely would have never become dysphoric because they would not have as much exposure to things like “gender identity.”
Children only start suffering from confusion when they are exposed to perversion and groomed into accepting it. Sadly, American public schools have now become grooming centers for confusion and sexual deviancy.
Keep in mind that the main character in Gender Queer fantasizes about receiving oral sex as if she had a penis, as well as discusses her pornography preferences with her friends.
The main character also complains about being “asexual,” which makes no sense since human beings are unable to reproduce all on their own, which is what asexuality is.
This and other ridiculously obscene subject matter would never even be on a child’s radar of understanding were it not being taught to them through books like this. By reading trash like this, children end up modeling it themselves, which is why we now have an entire generation of confused youth that does not understand basic biology.
“This mom’s desperate plea to stop teaching our kids to hate who they are has fallen on deaf ears,” reported the Post Millennial about how the NYC DOE is refusing to listen to concerned parents about this obscene curriculum.
More related news can be found at Gender.news.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
brainwashing, Child abuse, children, deviancy, gay porn, Gender identity, grooming, indoctrination, LGBT, lgbtq, perversion, public schools, trans, transgender
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 PSYCHO.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Psycho.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Psycho.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.